Contract Happiness

Contract Review Happiness

While signing contracts is part of doing business, not everyone understands the full implications of what they are signing, says Adrian Kitchin MAICD, managing director of insurance brokers Insurance Advisernet Australia. He warns that owners of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) could expose themselves to potential financial difficulty by entering into contracts without understanding the full implications or checking with their professional advisers. “The business owner is typically focusing solely on the perceived benefit and not necessarily appreciating the liabilities and other consequences of what is being signed,” he says. More than ever, large organisations are transferring as much risk as possible from their organisation to the other party to the contract.
Kitchin adds: “Even an experienced director who is well versed in commercial dealings, including contract negotiation, can sometimes make mistakes that are not immediately apparent. Best practice would be for a director to seek advice from his or her solicitor, accountant and insurance adviser prior to signing any commercial contract that binds the company. Quite often, seemingly innocuous terms can have far reaching effects that a director may not readily be able to establish from the wording of a contract.”
He believes the business owner or board of directors should ensure there is a policy in place that deals with the signing of contracts. “At best, unwittingly entering into a contract with unintended consequences would be considered unwise. To knowingly do so could be considered reckless,” he says. “Any board-driven policy that is put into place need not be onerous. We would suggest that the policy sets out that commercial contracts require review by the legal, accounting and insurance professionals that are retained by the firm. By doing so, a board in effect transfers its liabilities to its advisers who are charged to provide relevant and accurate advice on the consequences of signing a contract.”
Kitchin says the board should also adopt a sound risk management approach to ensure it does not knowingly or unknowingly enter into risky contracts. “In addition to the policy of referring the contracts to external advisers for review, the board should actively consider the suppliers and business partners with whom it does business regularly. “Where possible, it should have its own ‘standard’ commercial contract for its suppliers and another version for its customers that has been pre-approved by its external advisers rather than relying on another party’s contract which is unlikely to be as favourable. “When the company signs other non-standard contracts, it should have a checklist setting out various matters, in particular, the external sign-off that needs to be followed by the management team which is generally responsible for negotiation for approval by the board. Even where the board and the management team are one and the same, the checklist will still be of great value in avoiding potential mistakes.”

We find that by preparing a checklist of both legal limits and commercial limits, we achieve far better terms for our clients. Very often there are terms that are pushed down from a head contract which must be included as an essential term of a sub-contract, or significant additional liability might be incurred. It pays to spend an hour or two to review terms and have a robust discuss around “where can this project go wrong” or “where can the costs hurt us”, as a test of the acceptable limits.

Advice specific to a project or key service platform is essential as “one size fits all” approach does not work. We constantly review tender documents, Supply Agreements, Service and Works Contracts and Master Agreements for provision of services for our clients. It is especially critical to assess the commercial benefit of a contract and weigh this up against the potential liability it may represent should anything go wrong in the chain of companies providing services between head contracts and sub-contracts.

We are able to reduce or eliminate unnecessary risk by requesting simple departures from the written terms in the context of the service or works being provided for that part of a project.

Call Tony to discuss your needs before signing off any on “standard terms”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s